Žymos archyvas: prokuroras Julius Gelumbauskas

Rinaldas Adamonis, judge of Ukmerge District Court, lost in criminal case defending Ms. Sigita Jurgeleviciene

http://www.laisvaslaikrastis.lt/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3090:ukmerges-teismo-teisejas-rinaldas-adamonis-pasiklydo-viesuju-pirkimu-tarnybos-sefes-baudziamojoje-byloje&catid=31&Itemid=101

When faced the second person after the Prime Minister of the Republic of Lithuania, it’s easy to lose head in the excitement and the desire to indulge. This phenomenon,  described by Russian folk medicine, has the name of Vertigo diagnosis – dizziness and numbness in the feet. The judges are also people, so they have the right to make mistakes and get lost.

The portal „Laisvas laikrastis“ has published the opinion, that on the  23rd September, 2016, that the judge of Ukmerge region District Court Mr. Rinaldas Adamonis ordered a „punishment“ – deprived  Mr.Zigmantas Segzda of his right to enjoy his property peacefully, since Mr.Zigmantas Segzda criticised and published online publications about scandalous activities of Ms. Sigita Jurgeleviciene, the head of the Public Procurement Office under the Government of Lithuanian Republic.

Mr.Zigmantas Segzda has had quite a long conversation with the judge of Ukmerge region District Court Mr. Rinaldas Adamonis. Mr. Segzda wonders if the judge has understood him correctly, though  Mr. Segzda has been communicating legal arguments. On the  9th of November, 2016, Mr. Segzda  pledged a complaint before the Judicial Ethics and Discipline Commission regarding activities of the judge Mr. Rinaldas Adamonis assuming that the judge in a criminal case has been protected purely personal business of Ms. Sigita Jurgeleviciene, Deputy Director of the Public Procurement Office under the Government of Lithuanian Republic. It appears from this that Ms. Sigita Jurgeleviciene has been in a desperate need to adjudge 30, 000 EUR moral damages from her former lover.

On the 15th of April, 2016, the Ukmerge region District Court received the criminal case No 1-74-517/2016. Finally the judge Mr. Adamonis ordered the trial date – the 9th of September. 2016. Based on the above, the judge supposedly delayed the process for 4 months. Mr. Segzda considers, that by doing this, the judge Mr. Rinaldas Adamonis has violated the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Article 6:

 „In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of  any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law.“

 On the 4th of November, 2016, during the trial the judge Mr. Adamonis had come to a decision to reject 2 requests made by Mr. Segzda. It should be noted that the judge failed to give legal reasoning of his decision, which prevented the opportunity for Mr. Segzda to effectively challenge the court’s decision and violated the right of equal conditions to defend his legitimate interests.

On the 4th of November, 2016, the judge Mr. Adamonis explained that after the court passes sentence in a criminal case, Mr. Segzda may add some notes to the appeal on every issue, if he considers violation of his rights. It is obvious, that the judge did not avoid public speeches that predict the outcome of the case. Later on the judge pointed out again that after receiving a sentence Mr. Segzda may express his opinion on the legality of the verdict.  Mr. Segzda believes that in these speeches the judge Mr. Adamonis has disclosed his personal prejudice in giving the judgement, the judge revealed his personal prejudice against the accused, allowing to predict that Mr. Segzda is guilty. Mr. Segzda understands, that by doing this, the judge Mr. Rinaldas Adamonis has infringed the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Article 6:

„Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.“

Based on the above, Mr. Segzda implies that the judge has offended the Judges‘ Code of Ethics of the Republic of Lithuania.

Vilnius County Prosecutor‘s Office (Chief Mr. Ramutis Jancevicius) challenges a legal system in Lithuania

Themis

Prokuroro Ramučio Jancevičiaus prokuratūra pareiškė nepagarbą teismui ir žmogaus teisėms

http://www.zynios.lt/lietuvoje/prokuroro-ramucio-janceviciaus-prokuratura-pareiske-nepagarba-teismui-ir-zmogaus-teisems

 

On the 13th of July, 2016, Mr.Zigmantas Segzda lodged a complaint to the Prosecutor General of the Republic of Lithuania Mr. Evaldas Pasilis. Mr.Zigmantas Segzda believes that the following prosecutors of Vilnius County Prosecutor‘s Office violated principles of  the Prosecutors‘ Code of Lithuanian Republic: Chief prosecutor Mr. Ramutis Jancevicius, prosecutor Mr. Gediminas Bernotavicius, prosecutor Mr. Vilius Paulauskas and prosecutor Mr. Ricardas Kubilius.

In September, 2015, a public prosecutor Mr. Ricardas Kubilius has taken control over the pre-trial investigation, case No. 57-1-0699-14. The party concerned in this case is Ms. Sigita Jurgeleviciene, the head of the Public Procurement Office under the Government of Lithuanian Republic. It appears from the case materials, that prosecutor Mr. Vilius Paulauskas, a son of  the leader of the Labour Party, the member of Lithuanian Parliament Mr. Arturas Paulauskas, has actively protected interests of Ms. Sigita Jurgeleviciene during the pre-trial investigation.

On the 7th of July, 2016, prosecutor Mr. Ricardas Kubilius had not appeared to a public hearing at Ukmergė region District Court. A public prosecutor Mr. Julius Gelumbauskas (fromVilnius Regional Prosecutor’s Office, Seventh Division) has asked the court to postpone investigation of the case, since he has been appointed to the case No. 57-1-0699-14 only on the eve of the 7th of July, thus he was unable even to read materials of the case.

The judge of Ukmerge region District Court Mr. Rinaldas Adamonis has been astonished at sudden and unexpected replacement of a prosecutor.

It appears, that on the 16th of July, 2016, Vilnius Regional prosecutor Mr. Eugenjus Papucka had made a decision to displace the prosecutor, but his letter of appointment has been delivered to prosecutor Mr. Julius Gelumbauskas only on the 4th of July, 2016.

Mr.Zigmantas Segzda considers, that by doing this Vilnius County Prosecutor‘s Office has violated the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Article 6:

„In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of  any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law.“